Global Warming Page 4
Home   Back

--
-- Past global warming similar to today's: Size, duration were like modern climate shift, but in two pulses - 12/15/14
-- Climate change cools off - 8/25/14
-- Die großen, globalen Erwärmung swindle - Full Version  -  posted 2014/06/16
-- The great global warming swindle - Full version  -  posted 6/16/14
-- Fünf wissenschaftliche Gründe, dass sich die globale Erwärmung nicht statt - 2014/02/18
-- Five Scientific Reasons That Global Warming Isn't Happening - 2/18/14
-- Keine globale Erwärmung in den letzten 15 Jahren! - 2013/06/26
-- No global warming over the last 15 years! - 6/26/13
--
 


 Past global warming similar to today's: Size, duration were like modern climate shift, but in two pulses

December 15, 2014 Bianca Maibauer, University of Utah

Sediment cores that were drilled from Wyoming's Bighorn Basin and then sectioned for study are shown at a repository at the University of Bremen, Germany. A study of the cores led by University of Utah geochemist Gabe Bowen found that carbon emissions to the atmosphere during a global warming period almost 56 million years ago were more similar to today's human-caused climate change than previously was believed.

The rate at which carbon emissions warmed Earth's climate almost 56 million years ago resembles modern, human-caused global warming much more than previously believed, but involved two pulses of carbon to the atmosphere, University of Utah researchers and their colleagues found.

The findings mean the so-called Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum, or PETM, can provide clues to the future of modern climate change. The good news: Earth and most species survived. The bad news: It took millennia to recover from the episode, when temperatures rose by 5 to 8 degrees Celsius (9 to 15 degrees Fahrenheit).

"There is a positive note in that the world persisted, it did not go down in flames, it has a way of self-correcting and righting itself," says University of Utah geochemist Gabe Bowen, lead author of the study published today in the journal Nature Geoscience. "However, in this event it took almost 200,000 years before things got back to normal."

Bowen and colleagues report that carbonate or limestone nodules in Wyoming sediment cores show the global warming episode 55.5 million to 55.3 million years ago involved the average annual release of a minimum of 0.9 petagrams (1.98 trillion pounds) of carbon to the atmosphere, and probably much more over shorter periods.

That is "within an order of magnitude of, and may have approached, the 9.5 petagrams [20.9 trillion pounds] per year associated with modern anthropogenic carbon emissions," the researchers wrote. Since 1900, human burning of fossil fuels emitted an average of 3 petagrams per year -- even closer to the rate 55.5 million years ago.

Each pulse of carbon emissions lasted no more than 1,500 years. Previous conflicting evidence indicated the carbon release lasted anywhere from less than a year to tens of thousands of years. The new research shows atmospheric carbon levels returned to normal within a few thousand years after the first pulse, probably as carbon dissolved in the ocean. It took up to 200,000 years for conditions to normalize after the second pulse.

The new study also ruled as unlikely some theorized causes of the warming episode, including an asteroid impact, slow melting of permafrost, burning of organic-rich soil or drying out of a major seaway. Instead, the findings suggest, in terms of timing, that more likely causes included melting of seafloor methane ices known as clathrates, or volcanism heating organic-rich rocks and releasing methane.

"The Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum has stood out as a striking, but contested, example of how 21st-century-style atmospheric carbon dioxide buildup can affect climate, environments and ecosystems worldwide," says Bowen, an associate professor of geology and geophysics at the University of Utah.

"This new study tightens the link," he adds. "Carbon release back then looked a lot like human fossil-fuel emissions today, so we might learn a lot about the future from changes in climate, plants, and animal communities 55.5 million years ago."

Bowen cautioned, however, that global climate already was much warmer than today's when the Paleocene-Eocene warming began, and there were no icecaps, "so this played out on a different playing field than what we have today."

Study co-author Scott Wing, a paleobiologist at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, adds: "This study gives us the best idea yet of how quickly this vast amount of carbon was released at the beginning of the global warming event we call the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum. The answer is just a few thousands of years or less. That's important because it means the ancient event happened at a rate more like human-caused global warming than we ever realized."

Bowen and Wing conducted the study with University of Utah geology and geophysics master's graduate Bianca Maibauer and technician Amy Steimke; Mary Kraus of University of Colorado, Boulder; Ursula Rohl and Thomas Westerhold of the University of Bremen, Germany; Philip Gingerich of the University of Michigan; and William Clyde of the University of New Hampshire. The study was funded by the National Science Foundation and the German Research Foundation

Effects of the Paleocene-Eocene Warming

Bowen says previous research has shown that during the Paleocene-Eocene warm period, there was "enhanced storminess in some areas, increased aridity in other places. We see continent-scale migration of animals and plants, ranges are shifting. We see only a little bit of extinction -- some groups of deep-sea foraminifera, one-cell organisms that go extinct at the start of this event. Not much else went extinct."

"We see the first wave of modern mammals showing up," including ancestral primates and hoofed animals," he adds. Oceans became more acidic, as they are now.

"We look through time recorded in those rocks, and this warming event stands out, and everything happens together," Bowen says. "We can look back in Earth's history and say this is how this world works, and it's totally consistent with the expectation that carbon dioxide change today will be associated with these other sorts of change."

The Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum also points to the possibility of runaway climate change enhanced by feedbacks. "The fact we have two releases may suggest that second one was driven by the first," perhaps, for example, if the first warming raised sea temperatures enough to melt massive amounts of frozen methane, Bowen says.

Drilling into Earth's Past

The new study is part of a major drilling project to understand the 56-milion-year-old warming episode, which Bowen says first was discovered in 1991. The researchers drilled long, core-shaped sediment samples from two boreholes at Polecat Bench in northern Wyoming's Bighorn Basin, east of Cody and just north of Powell.

"This site has been excavated for well over 100 years by paleontologists studying fossil mammals," Bowen says. "It documents that transition from the early mammals we see after the extinction of the dinosaurs to Eocene mammals, which are in groups that are familiar today. There is a great stratigraphic sequence of more than 2 kilometers (1.2 miles) of rocks, from 65 million years ago to 52 million years ago."

The Paleocene-Eocene warming is recorded in the banded, flood-deposit tan and rusted red rock and soil layers of the Willwood formation, specifically within round, gray to brown-gray carbonate nodules in those rocks. They are 2 inches to 0.1 inches diameter.

By measuring carbon isotope ratios in the nodules, the researchers found that during each 1,500-year carbon release, the ratio of carbon-13 to carbon-12 in the atmosphere declined, indicating two large releases of carbon dioxide or methane, both greenhouse gases from plant material. The decline was three parts per thousand for the first pulse, and 5.7 parts per thousand for the second.

Previous evidence from seafloor sediments elsewhere is consistent with two Paleocene-Eocene carbon pulses, which "means we don't think this is something is unique to northern Wyoming," Bowen says. "We think it reflects a global signal."

What Caused the Prehistoric Warming?

The double-barreled carbon release at the Paleocene-Eocene time boundary pretty much rules out an asteroid or comet impact because such a catastrophe would have been "too quick" to explain the 1,500-year duration of each carbon pulse, Bowen says.

Another theory: oxidation of organic matter -- as permafrost thawed, as peaty soils burned or as a seaway dried up -- may have caused the Paleocene-Eocene warming. But that would have taken tens of thousands of years, far slower than what the study found, he adds. Volcanoes releasing carbon gases also would have been too slow.

Bowen says the two relatively rapid carbon releases (about 1,500 years each) are more consistent with warming oceans or an undersea landslide triggering the melting of frozen methane on the seafloor and large emissions to the atmosphere, where it became carbon dioxide within decades. Another possibility is a massive intrusion of molten rock that heated overlying organic-rich rocks and released a lot of methane, he says.

Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by University of Utah. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/12/141215113949.htm
 

 Climate change cools off

Monday, August 25, 2014

Al Gore can’t even give away treats from his ice-cream truck

Al Gore goofed. Instead of talking up “climate extremes,” he should have spoken about the dangers of an increasingly mild climate. Washington is likely to wrap up the month (and the summer) with the mercury having topped 90 degrees only once or twice. This has been shown to lead to increased lounging in the backyard and heightened consumption of grilled hot dogs.

The error was apparent last month when Mr. Gore tried to give away ice cream from his “I’m too hot” truck at An Environmental Protection Agency field hearing in Denver. It was a clever idea for a July event, but at 58 degrees he had no takers. Gong-show liberals have ramped up alarmism, apparent over the past few days.

The left-wing magazine Mother Jones blames global warming for “ruining your breakfast.” Mankind’s penchant for exhaling carbon dioxide is supposed to be responsible for the rise in the price of cornflakes, a bacon shortage, bland coffee and a 2009 flood that reduced waffle production. No mention was made of ethanol mandates cutting into corn production, which could cause a shortage of cornbread, nor of the Food and Drug Administration’s shutting down the Georgia factory where Eggo waffles are made for a session of “enhanced cleaning.”

Disasters make great headlines, so The New Zealand Herald blames global warming for “pandemics and plagues,” as though the Ebola virus spawned from large carbon footprints.

Leonardo DiCaprio, the wealthy actor with time on his hands, is producing a series of short films advocating raising gasoline and electricity prices through higher taxes. “We need to keep this carbon in the ground,” says the star of 1997’s “Titanic.” “In order to prevent a catastrophic warming of the planet by 2 degrees Celsius,” he says, “we cannot burn more than 500 gigatons of carbon into the atmosphere.” It all sounds so official and precise, but the process of releasing “carbon” into the atmosphere is what we all do when we exhale.

Shortness of breath abounds at the Huffington Post, which treated its online readers to a gallery of “scared scientists,” black-and-white photographs of hyperventilating researchers whose brows furled for the cameras as they read the results of their own research predicting the extinction of species, global conflict and widespread famine. For maximum effect, each photo shoot ended before smile-inducing government grant checks arrived.

Inspired by the snapshots, frightened editors at The Washington Post opened a multipart series on the “urgency of action” needed to prevent the rise of the sea level, heat waves, floods and wildfires, as if these perennial problems would go away if only Congress would adopt a carbon-dioxide emissions credit-trading scheme.

Such a tax would cure every ill, since in the alarmist mind, all the world’s problems derive from global warming. Are the California and Florida coastlines sinking? Is climate change melting the polar ice caps and raising the sea level? Is California rising? That, too, is caused by global warming.

Movieseum 10 TV Shows That S…MovieseumHank Haney University Classic golf mistak…Hank Haney UniversityAncestry.com There Are 7 Types …Ancestry.comMoneynews Born Before 1965? …Moneynewsby Taboolaby TaboolaSponsored LinksSponsored LinksPromoted LinksPromoted Links
Last week, the Scripps Institution of Oceanography reported GPS measurements that show the ground is rising throughout the West, with mountains growing between 0.15 and half an inch. Scientists surmise that the tectonic plate lifted because 63 trillion gallons of very heavy water evaporated during the recent drought.

Proof that global warming is a fraud isn’t found in a few weeks of pleasant temperatures, but in the complete failure of the climate models to predict the weather over the past decade and a half. Instead of ringing the alarm bells, everyone should unfurl the hammock and grab a glass of lemonade (before it turns into a Popsicle).

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/25/editorial-climate-change-cools-off/#!#ixzz3ByhpDSFK
 

 Die großen, globalen Erwärmung swindle - Full Version

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtevF4B4RtQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Ich kenne der diese Informationen gut vor dieses Video wurde entwickelt. Für diejenigen, die Teil dieser Erwärmung Relegion, dieses Video ist eine häretische Dokument, da er nicht einverstanden ist mit der Erwärmung liegen, dass der Mensch die Erderwärmung - insgesamt liegen.

Warming panic zeichnet jährlich Milliarden von Dollars in die Gruppen, die sich in betrügerischer Absicht es zu schieben. Die "armen Eisbären" -Anweisung, um durch leichtes Wackeln an die Herzen der Menschen - vor allem die Kid's Herz, haben tatsächlich mehr seit den 1950er Jahren oder so.

Wir sind betrogen für den Zweck der Leistung mehr Geld für den Betrüger, und viel von den Betrügereien kommt von den Regierungen in Form von Steuern.

 The great global warming swindle - Full version

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtevF4B4RtQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player

I have known of this information well before this video was developed.  For those that are part of this warming relegion, this video is a heretical document because it disagrees with the warming lie, that humans are causing warming – a total lie.

Warming panic draws billions of dollars into the groups that are fraudulently pushing it.  The “poor polar bears” statement, designed to tug at people’s hearts – especially the kid’s hearts, have actual increased in numbers since the 1950s or so.
We are being defrauded for the purpose of providing more funds for the fraudsters, and much of the fraud is perpetrated by governments in the form of taxes.
 


 Fünf wissenschaftliche Gründe, dass sich die globale Erwärmung nicht statt

John Hawkins 2/18/2014

Wie hat sich die Erderwärmung Diskussionen Ende nach oben Klappbarer Tragegriff am Was ist los mit den Eisbären, nicht überprüfbare vorhersagen was passieren wird in hundert Jahren, und ob die Leute "Klima Leugner" oder "globale Erwärmung Kultisten?" Wenn es handelt sich um ein wissenschaftliches Thema, warum sind nicht wir verbringen mehr Zeit mit Diskussionen über die Wissenschaft daran beteiligt? Warum reden wir nicht über die Erkenntnisse und die eigentlichen Daten beteiligt? Warum sind wir nicht ein Blick auf die Prognosen, die gemacht wurden und zu sehen, ob sie mit dem Ergebnis? Wenn es sich um ein so öffnen und schließen, warum sind so viele Menschen, die über die Wissenschaft skeptisch?

Viele Amerikaner sind uns seit langem dachte, dass die besten verfügbaren wissenschaftlichen Gutachten vorgeschlagen, dass man nicht jede Art von globaler Erwärmung. Jetzt aber, wir können sogar noch weiter gehen und schlagen vor, dass sich der Planet ist noch nicht erwärmen.

1) Es gibt keine globale Erwärmung seit 1997: Wenn sich nichts ändert in der nächsten Jahre, wir haben auch Kinder, die ihren Abschluß in High School, die sich noch nie gesehen, dass eine "globale Erwärmung" während ihrer gesamten Lebensdauer. Das ist richtig; die Temperatur des Planeten ist im wesentlichen flach für 17 Jahre. Dies ist nicht eine umstrittene Behauptung entweder. Auch der ehemalige Direktor des Climate Research Unit (CRU) der University of East Anglia, Phil Jones, räumt ein, dass es wahr ist. Da der Planet war Kühlung von 1940-1975 und der Aufschwung in Temperatur danach dauerte nur 23 Jahre, ein 17 Jahr Pause ist eine große Sache. Es stellt sich auch die Frage nahe: Wie können wir bei globalen Erwärmung wenn es gibt keine eigentliche "globale Erwärmung?" 2

) Es gibt keinen wissenschaftlichen Konsens, dass sich die globale Erwärmung stattfindet, und vom Menschen verursacht: Die Fragen werden nicht vom "Konsens." In der Tat, viele wissenschaftliche Theorien, die nach allgemeiner Auffassung um wahr zu sein wurden keine Rolle spielt durch neue Beweise vor. Nur eine von vielen, vielen Beispielen, in den frühen siebziger Jahren, Wissenschaftler glaubten globale Abkühlung war als üblich. Allerdings, wenn die Planeten begonnen, warm up, änderten sie ihre Meinung.
Und dennoch, die primär "wissenschaftliche" Argumente für die globale Erwärmung ist, daß es einen "wissenschaftlichen Konsens", dass es auftritt. Abgesehen von der Tatsache, dass das nicht ein wissenschaftliches Argument, auch wenn das jemals wahr war (und es war wirklich nicht), aber es ist auf jeden Fall nicht mehr wahr. Mehr als 31.000 Wissenschaftler unterzeichnet haben, eine Petition sagen: Menschen sind nicht Ursache für die globale Erwärmung. Mehr als 1000 Wissenschaftler unterschrieben habe und ein anderer Bericht spricht: Es gibt keine globale Erwärmung. Es gibt Zehntausende von gut ausgebildeten, mainstream Wissenschaftler, die nicht damit einverstanden, dass sich die globale Erwärmung auftreten und Menschen, die mit Ihnen einer Meinung sind unter einer Position wissenschaftliche Grundlage.

3) Arctic Ice ist bis zu 50% seit 2012: Der Verlust des Arktischen Eises ist bisher ein großer Gesprächsstoff für Menschen, die glauben globale Erwärmung kommt. Manche Menschen haben sogar vorhergesagt, dass alle Eis der Arktis schmilzt nun wegen der globalen Erwärmung. Dennoch, in den arktischen Eis bis 50% seit 2012. Wie viel Arctic Ice wirklich zählt, ist eine offene Frage, denn die sehr begrenzte Hinweise darauf haben wir darauf hin, dass noch vor wenigen Jahrzehnten gab es weniger Eis als es heute ist, aber die gleichen Leute, die meinten, die Tropfen in Eis hervorzuheben ist in jedem Fall einräumen, daß der Anstieg ist ebenso wichtig.

4) Klima Modelle, globale Erwärmung wurden falsch: Dieser Zukunftsprojektionen von dem, was die Klimaerwärmung wird tun, um die Planeten wurden auf Basis von Klimamodellen. Im Wesentlichen, Wissenschaftler annahmen darüber, wie stark verschiedene Faktoren haben wird; sie schätzen, wie viel von einem Wandel wird es und dann Sie Projekt über die Zeit ändert. Leider sind fast alle diese Modelle zeigen enorme Temperatur Gewinne haben sich als falsch.

Ehemalige NASA-Wissenschaftler Dr. Roy Spencer sagt, dass Klima Modelle, die von Regierungsstellen Richtlinien zu erstellen "kläglich gescheitert." Spencer analysiert 90 Klima Modelle an der Fläche Temperatur- und Satelliten Temperatur Daten, und stellte fest, dass mehr als 95 Prozent der Modelle "die Prognose der Temperaturanstieg seit 1979, ob wir mit ihrer eigenen Oberflächentemperatur Dataset (HadCRUT4), oder unsere Satelliten Dataset der unteren Troposphäre Temperaturen (UAH) ."

Es gibt ein altes Sprichwort in der Programmierung, dass geht, "Garbage in, garbage out." Mit anderen Worten: Wenn die Annahmen und Daten, die sie in den Modellen sind defekt, dann die Ergebnisse wertlos sein wird. Wenn die Klimamodelle zeigen, dass eine katastrophale Auswirkungen, da der globalen Erwärmung sind nicht zuverlässig - und sie sind nicht - dann ist das langfristige Prognosen sind bedeutungslos.

5) Prognosen über die Auswirkungen der globalen Erwärmung sind bereits widerlegt: Die Debatte über globale Erwärmung hat lange genug, dass wir uns schon mal um zu sehen, ob sich eine der Vorhersagen Menschen darum gemacht haben in der realen Welt. z. b. Al Gore erwartet alle arktischen Eis weg war von 2013. Im Jahr 2005 hat das unabhängige lief ein Artikel, dass die Arktis selbst hatte eine tödliche Spirale.


Wissenschaftler befürchten, dass die Arktis ist nun in eine nicht mehr rückholbare phase der Erwärmung, die Beschleunigung der Verlust der polar sea ice, die dazu beigetragen hat, dass das Klima stabil für Tausende von Jahren .... Die größte Angst ist, dass die Arktis erreicht hat ein "Tipping Point" über die nichts können die kontinuierlichen Verlust an Eis und mit ihm die massiven land Gletscher Grönlands, der Meeresspiegel dramatisch.

Inzwischen, Arctic Ice ist bis zu 50% seit 2012. James Hansen von der NASA fame vorhergesagt, dass die West Side Highway in New York wäre unter Wasser durch nun wegen der globalen Erwärmung.

Wenn die Klimamodelle und die Prognosen über die Folgen der globalen Erwärmung sind nicht einmal annähernd in Ordnung, wäre es nicht mehr wissenschaftliche ablehnen übereilten Maßnahmen auf fehlerhaften Daten, so dass wir können weitere Prüfung der Angelegenheit und finden Sie heraus, was wirklich los ist?

 Five Scientific Reasons That Global Warming Isn't Happening

John Hawkins 2/18/2014

How did global warming discussions end up hinging on what's happening with polar bears, unverifiable predictions of what will happen in a hundred years, and whether people are "climate deniers" or "global warming cultists?" If this is a scientific topic, why aren't we spending more time discussing the science involved? Why aren't we talking about the evidence and the actual data involved? Why aren't we looking at the predictions that were made and seeing if they match up to the results? If this is such an open and shut case, why are so many people who care about science skeptical?

Many Americans have long since thought that the best scientific evidence available suggested that man wasn't causing any sort of global warming. However, now, we can go even further and suggest that the planet isn't warming at all.

1) There hasn't been any global warming since 1997: If nothing changes in the next year, we're going to have kids who graduate from high school who will have never seen any "global warming" during their lifetimes. That's right; the temperature of the planet has essentially been flat for 17 years. This isn't a controversial assertion either. Even the former Director of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, Phil Jones, admits that it's true. Since the planet was cooling from 1940-1975 and the upswing in temperature afterward only lasted 23 years, a 17 year pause is a big deal. It also begs an obvious question: How can we be experiencing global warming if there's no actual "global warming?"

2) There is no scientific consensus that global warming is occurring and caused by man: Questions are not decided by "consensus." In fact, many scientific theories that were once widely believed to be true were made irrelevant by new evidence. Just to name one of many, many examples, in the early seventies, scientists believed global cooling was occurring. However, once the planet started to warm up, they changed their minds.
Yet, the primary "scientific" argument for global warming is that there is a "scientific consensus" that it's occurring. Setting aside the fact that's not a scientific argument, even if that ever was true (and it really wasn't), it's certainly not true anymore. Over 31,000 scientists have signed on to a petition saying humans aren't causing global warming. More than 1000 scientists signed on to another report saying there is no global warming at all. There are tens of thousands of well-educated, mainstream scientists who do not agree that global warming is occurring at all and people who share their opinion are taking a position grounded in science.

3) Arctic ice is up 50% since 2012: The loss of Arctic ice has been a big talking point for people who believe global warming is occurring. Some people have even predicted that all of the Arctic ice would melt by now because of global warming. Yet, Arctic ice is up 50% since 2012. How much Arctic ice really matters is an open question since the very limited evidence we have suggests that a few decades ago, there was less ice than there is today, but the same people who thought the drop in ice was noteworthy should at least agree that the increase is important as well.

4) Climate models showing global warming have been wrong over and over: These future projections of what global warming will do to the planet have been based on climate models. Essentially, scientists make assumptions about how much of an impact different factors will have; they guess how much of a change there will be and then they project changes over time. Unfortunately, almost all of these models showing huge temperature gains have turned out to be wrong.


Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer says that climate models used by government agencies to create policies “have failed miserably.” Spencer analyzed 90 climate models against surface temperature and satellite temperature data, and found that more than 95 percent of the models “have over-forecast the warming trend since 1979, whether we use their own surface temperature dataset (HadCRUT4), or our satellite dataset of lower tropospheric temperatures (UAH).”

There's an old saying in programming that goes, "Garbage in, garbage out." In other words, if the assumptions and data you put into the models are faulty, then the results will be worthless. If the climate models that show a dire impact because of global warming aren't reliable -- and they're not -- then the long term projections they make are meaningless.

5) Predictions about the impact of global warming have already been proven wrong: The debate over global warming has been going on long enough that we've had time to see whether some of the predictions people made about it have panned out in the real world. For example, Al Gore predicted all the Arctic ice would be gone by 2013. In 2005, the Independent ran an article saying that the Artic had entered a death spiral.


Scientists fear that the Arctic has now entered an irreversible phase of warming which will accelerate the loss of the polar sea ice that has helped to keep the climate stable for thousands of years....The greatest fear is that the Arctic has reached a “tipping point” beyond which nothing can reverse the continual loss of sea ice and with it the massive land glaciers of Greenland, which will raise sea levels dramatically.

Meanwhile, Arctic ice is up 50% since 2012. James Hansen of NASA fame predicted that the West Side Highway in New York would be under water by now because of global warming.

If the climate models and the predictions about global warming aren't even close to being correct, wouldn't it be more scientific to reject hasty action based on faulty data so that we can further study the issue and find out what's really going on?
 

 Keine globale Erwärmung in den letzten 15 Jahren!

26.06.2013 MRC Media Research Center

Nach Milliarden von Dollars der Steuerzahler für grüne Energie verschwendet unzählige Verordnungen, die Unternehmen zu verletzen und zerstören ganze Industriezweige sowie eine massive Propaganda-Kampagne durch die "News" und Unterhaltung Medien, gab es keine globale Erwärmung in den letzten 15 Jahren!

Wir wissen jetzt, dass nach Milliarden an Steuergeldern verschwendet auf Ökostrom Subventionen, MRC Media Research Center

unzählige Verordnungen, die Unternehmen zu verletzen und zerstören ganze Industriezweige sowie eine massive Propagandakampagne durch die "News" und Unterhaltung-Medien, es wurde keine globale Erwärmung in den letzten 15 Jahren!

Sogar die New York Times hat bestätigt, dass die wissenschaftliche Gemeinschaft erklären kann, warum die globale Temperaturen in den letzten 15 Jahren erhöht noch nicht.

Deutsche Klimaforscher Hans von Storch der Meteorologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg wies auf die großen Probleme des Klimawandels vor kurzem modellieren, erklärte: "niemand bisher hat bieten eine überzeugende Antwort auf Warum Klimawandel scheint, eine Auszeit zu nehmen. Wir sind ein Rätsel konfrontiert. Den letzten CO2-Emissionen sind tatsächlich noch steil, als wir befürchtet gestiegen. Infolgedessen nach den meisten Klimamodelle, sollten wir Temperaturen steigen von ca. 0,25 Grad Celsius (0,45 Grad Fahrenheit) in den letzten 10 Jahren gesehen haben. Ist das nicht passiert."

Nur wenige Amerikaner kennen die Wahrheit über die globalen Temperaturen, gerade weil die nationalen Medien ihrer Berichterstattung zum Thema Zensur wurde!

Die Media-Research-Center Business und Media Institute (BMI), die genaue fördert berichtet Berichterstattung über die Wirtschaft, dass ABC, NBC und CBS der "Windstille" komplett zensiert haben Erwärmung in den letzten Jahren in allen 92 Klima-Geschichten, die sie im Jahr 2013 gemeldet.

BMI sah die "Climate Change" oder "globale Erwärmung" Geschichten aus dem 1. Januar 2013, durch 15. Juni 2013, die unter anderem bei ABC, CBS und NBC, morgens und abends gelüftet, Feststellung, dass "Es gab mehr als 8-mal so viele Geschichten, die zitiert eine Studie oder enthalten einen Wissenschaftler, der globalen Erwärmung Alarmismus zu fördern, als eine Studie zitiert, enthalten einen Wissenschaftler an Panikmache."

Dies ist kein Journalismus. Es ist eklatante linke Propaganda. Und Sie können helfen, verfügbar zu machen und durch unsere Petition unterzeichnet und weit und breit Weiterleitung an Ihre Freunde und Familie zu neutralisieren.

Präsident Obama soeben angekündigt, seine Pläne zur weiteren treiben Energiekosten zur Bekämpfung von "Climate Change." Leider ignorieren anstatt an ihn auf die Annahmen hinter seinen Plan, die Medien routinemäßig die Tatsachen und die Linie bis auf seiner Agenda unterstützen.

Die Medien lieben diese Agenda. Es ist ihre Agenda. Sie werden gerne ignorieren die Tatsache, die globale Temperaturen in den letzten 15 Jahren nicht gestiegen, wenn es sich um so genannte "grüne" Programm des Präsidenten helfen. Wir brauchen dies offen legen!

Wir startete die "Stop Zensur News!"-Kampagne zur Bekämpfung der liberalen Medien bedauerliche Praxis der Nachrichten, die Macht der Obama-Administration schlecht aussehen oder behindert ihre Agenda große staatliche Zensur — und der linken falschen globalen Erwärmung Crusade ist das ultimative Symbol der großen Regierung.

Damit uns die Medien noch nie dagewesene Zensur der News ein Ende setzen und Ihre kostenlose "Stop Zensur News!"-Aufkleber erhalten, melden Sie jetzt unsere Petition!

Vielen Dank für Ihre Unterstützung und Hilfe bei der Aufdeckung von Medienzensur der Nachrichten.
 


 No global warming over the last 15 years!

6/26/2013     MRC  Media Research Center

After billions of taxpayer dollars wasted on green energy, countless regulations that hurt businesses and destroy entire industries, as well as a massive propaganda campaign by the “news” and entertainment media, there has been no global warming over the last 15 years!

 We now know that after billions of taxpayer dollars wasted on green energy subsidies, MRC  Media Research Center

countless regulations that hurt businesses and destroy entire industries, as well as a massive propaganda campaign by the “news” and entertainment media, there has been no global warming over the last 15 years!

Even The New York Times has confirmed that the scientific community can’t explain why global temperatures haven’t increased in the past 15 years.

German climate scientist Hans von Storch of the Meteorological Institute of the University of Hamburg pointed to the major problems of climate modeling recently, stating, “So far, no one has been able to provide a compelling answer to why climate change seems to be taking a break. We're facing a puzzle. Recent CO2 emissions have actually risen even more steeply than we feared. As a result, according to most climate models, we should have seen temperatures rise by around 0.25 degrees Celsius (0.45 degrees Fahrenheit) over the past 10 years. That hasn't happened.”

Few Americans are aware of the truth about global temperatures, precisely because the national news media have been censoring their reporting on the topic!

The Media Research Center’s Business and Media Institute (BMI), which promotes accurate reporting on business and the economy, reports that ABC, NBC and CBS have completely censored the “lull” in warming in recent years in all 92 climate stories they reported in 2013.

BMI looked at all the “climate change” or “global warming” stories from Jan. 1, 2013, through June 15, 2013, that aired on ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening news programs, finding that “there were more than 8 times as many stories that cited a study or included a scientist promoting global warming alarmism than cited a study or included a scientist challenging alarmism.”

This isn’t journalism. It’s blatant left-wing propaganda. And you can help expose and neutralize it by signing our petition and forwarding it far and wide to your friends and family.

President Obama just announced his plans to further drive up energy costs in order to fight “climate change.” Unfortunately, instead of challenging him on the assumptions behind his plan, the media routinely ignore the facts and line up to support his agenda.

The media love this agenda. It’s their agenda, too. They will gladly ignore the fact that global temperatures have not gone up in the past 15 years, if it help the President’s so-called “green” agenda. We need to expose this!

We launched the “Stop Censoring the News!” campaign to confront the liberal media’s deplorable practice of censoring news that makes the Obama Administration look bad or hampers their big government agenda—and the Left’s phony global warming crusade is the ultimate symbol of big government.

To help us put an end to the media’s unprecedented censorship of the news and to receive your free “Stop Censoring the News!” bumper sticker, sign our petition right now!

Thank you for your support and assistance in exposing media censorship of the news.