Islam and Muslims -- Facts and Fiction

-- New video messages from militant cleric - 10/23/10
-- AL-TAQIYA ... The Muslim Method Of Conquest - Posted 9/11/2010
-- AL-TAQIYA ... Die moslemische Methode der Eroberung - Posted 9/11/2010
-- Sound familiar?? Seems like a carbon copy of what is happening in the USA: - Posted 8/14/2010
-- Tönen vertraut? Ist einem Durchschlag dessen ähnlich, was in Deutchland geschieht: - 8/14/2010
-- Radical Islamist Group Is Returning to Chicago for Major Recruitment Drive - 6/16/2010
-- In Deeply Divided Turkey, Voters Approve Constitutional Changes - 9/13/10
-- Imam Says NYC Mosque Site Is Not Hallowed Ground - 9/13/10
-- U.S. Faces Growing Terror Threat from Indigenous Muslims Experts Find - 9/14/10
-- Muslims burn down Christian shops and church - 2/27/10

Home    Back

 In Deeply Divided Turkey, Voters Approve Constitutional Changes

September 13, 2010    By Patrick Goodenough

Prime Minister Erdogan wants to implement 26 amendments to the constitution that was established after a military coup in 1980. Many are uncontroversial, but opposition parties are particularly unhappy about proposed changes to the way judges are appointed.

[1] Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan addresses the media at an Istanbul polling station after casting his vote in a constitutional referendum on Sunday, Sept. 12, 2010. (AP Photo/Burhan Ozbilici)

( – A referendum on far-reaching constitutional changes has ended with victory for Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan but revealed a country deeply divided, with many suspicious about his religious agenda.

“Today, the winner is democracy,” Erdogan declared in Istanbul late Sunday, after preliminary results showed 58 percent of voters had approved his constitutional reform package. Forty-one percent voted against the measures.

Erdogan wants to implement 26 amendments to the constitution that was established after a military coup in 1980. Many are uncontroversial, but opposition parties are particularly unhappy about proposed changes to the way judges are appointed.

The judiciary has been a key defender of Turkey’s official secularism, and critics worry that plans to give parliament more say in the appointment of judges may be an attempt by Erdogan’s Islamist-leaning Justice and Development Party (AKP) to undermine its independence – and Turkey’s secular principles.

Opposition parties have also been uneasy about a perceived “eastward” drift under Erdogan, who has drawn closer to Iran and Syria, become a vocal critic of Israel and defender of Hamas, and in June disappointed the U.S. by voting against a U.N. Security Council resolution imposing new sanctions against Iran over its nuclear activities.

The main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) expressed regret over Sunday’s referendum outcome and warned about what party leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu called a “tense polarizing atmosphere” in which “a healthy democratization process is not possible.”

The second largest opposition grouping, the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), issued a statement lamenting “a dark page in our history.” Both the CHP and MHP however said they would respect the result.

Other proposed amendments are aimed at keeping the military in check and bringing the constitution closer towards the standards of the European Union. Turkey has for decades been trying to join the 27-nation union, but still faces opposition from some of its most powerful members, including Germany and France.

The AKP took office in 2002 and won re-election in 2007 with a substantially increased share of the vote. Earlier this year opinion polls placed the CHP ahead of the AKP for the first time since 2002.

The next election is scheduled for next summer, and both CHP and MHP in their reactions to the referendum looked ahead to that vote.


Home    TOC    Top

 Imam Says NYC Mosque Site Is Not Hallowed Ground

September 13, 2010    By melanie

New York (AP) - It may be two blocks from ground zero, but the site of a proposed mosque and Islamic center shouldn't been seen as sacrosanct in a neighborhood that also harbors a strip club and a betting parlor, the cleric leading the effort said Monday.

Making an ardent case for the compatibility of Islam and American values, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf reiterated that he was searching for a solution to the furor the project has created. But he left unanswered exactly what he had in mind.

If anything, Rauf only deepened the questions around the project's future, telling an audience at the Council on Foreign Relations think tank that he was "exploring all options" - but declining to specify them - and underscoring what he saw as the importance of a location that would draw attention to his message of promulgating moderate Islam. And while opponents of the project see it as insulting the memories of the thousands killed by Muslim extremists in the 2001 terrorist attacks, Rauf said he didn't see it as sacred memorial space.

"It's absolutely disingenuous, as many have said, that that block is hallowed ground," Rauf said, noting the nearby exotic dance and betting businesses. "So let's clarify that misperception."

The proposed Islamic center has become a flashpoint for worldwide debate about Islam's place in America nine years after the Sept. 11 attacks. Controversy has colored the fall campaign season and cast a a shadow on this past weekend's commemoration of the attacks, with supporters and opponents of the mosque project both holding rallies nearby.

Rauf says a project meant to foster understanding has become unduly mired in conflict and what he describes as misconceptions of a fundamental clash between Islamic and American values. The Kuwait-born imam used his own life story as an example, saying that his own faith had been shaped by the sense of choosing one's identity that American society provided, compared with the predominantly Muslim society from which he emigrated in 1965.

"I'm a devout Muslim ... and I'm also a proud American citizen," said Rauf, noting that he was naturalized in 1979 and has a niece serving in the U.S. Army. "I vote in elections. I pay taxes. I pledge allegiance to the flag. And I'm a Giants fan."

He said Monday that the Islamic center's organizers were surprised by the uproar and might not have pursued it had they known what was coming.

"The events of these past few weeks have really saddened me to my very core," he said, lamenting that the project had been misunderstood, clouded by stereotypes, and "exploited" by some to push personal or political agendas.

But he declined to detail any strategy for quieting the clamor - or say whether that might include moving the project.

"We are exploring all options as we speak right now, and we are working through what will be a solution, God willing, that will resolve this crisis, defuse it and not create any unforeseen or untoward circumstances that we do not want to see happen," Rauf said during a question-and-answer session following his speech. "Everything is on the table. ... We really are focused on solving it, and solving it in the way that will create the best possible outcome for all."

He suggested the locale's high profile served an important purpose for the proposed $100 million Islamic center, which organizers describe as featuring prayer space, but also a swimming pool, culinary school, art studios and other features.

"We need to create a platform where the voice of moderate Muslims would be amplified," Rauf said. "This is an opportunity that we must capitalize on so that those who teach moderation will have a mega-horn."

But to at least some who listened to his talk Monday, that's not what Rauf is doing.

Fouad Ajami, a Middle East studies professor at Johns Hopkins University, said Rauf's appearance didn't change his misgivings about the mosque project.

"I just think it's provocative," Ajami said. While organizers may have the right to build it, "the prudence of it, the wisdom of it" is the question, he said.


Home    TOC    Top

 U.S. Faces Growing Terror Threat from Indigenous Muslims Experts Find

September 14, 2010     By Matt Cover

( – The United States faces a growing threat from terrorists drawn from “immigrant and indigenous Muslims as well as converts to Islam,” a new report finds. These new sources of radical Islamic terrorism defy attempts at profiling because they come from all walks of American life.

The report, Assessing the Terrorist Threat, [2] was written by terrorism expert Bruce Hoffman and veteran journalist Peter Bergen and published by the Bipartisan Policy Center’s National Security Preparedness Group, which is headed by 9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas Kean and Vice Chairman Lee Hamilton.

Kean is a former Republican governor of New Jersey and Hamilton is a former Democratic representative of Indiana.

The report’s main conclusion is that the United States faces a new and growing threat from Islamic extremists radicalized in America. The conventional wisdom – that America could avoid the problem of increased domestic radicalization plaguing Europe – is wrong, according to the report [2].

“The conventional wisdom has long been that America was immune to the heady currents of radicalization affecting both immigrant and indigenous Muslim communities elsewhere in the West,” the report says. “That has now been shattered by the succession of cases that have recently come to light of terrorist radicalization and recruitment occurring in the United States.”

Those incidents, including the failed Times Square bombing attempt, the shooting rampage of Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, and the shooting of two Army recruiters in Arkansas, show that America is “little different from Europe” when it comes to the domestic threat of Islamic radicalization.

“Given this list of incidents involving homegrown radicals, lone wolves, and trained terrorist recruits, the U.S. is arguably now little different from Europe in terms of having a domestic terrorist problem involving immigrant and indigenous Muslims, as well as converts to Islam,” Hoffman and Bergen conclude.

While this growing threat is “embryonic” in the authors’ opinion, it is deadly nonetheless and poses grave problems for U.S. domestic counter-terrorism efforts because the terrorists coming from within the United States defy attempts to categorize or otherwise profile them, making finding and thwarting them increasingly difficult.

“The diversity of these latest foot soldiers in the wars of terrorism being waged against the U.S. underscores how much the terrorist threat has changed since the September 11, 2001, attacks,” reads the report.

“The only common denominator appears to be a newfound hatred for their native or adopted country, a degree of dangerous malleability, and a religious fervor justifying or legitimizing violence that impels these very impressionable and perhaps easily influenced individuals toward potentially lethal acts of violence,” Hoffman and Bergen state.

These new terrorists, like Times Square bomber Faizal Shazhad, may still be connected to known international terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda and its affiliates but may also turn into terrorists “in the comfort of” their own bedrooms. This presents U.S. authorities with a uniquely complex threat that resists all previously known efforts to counter it, as authorities can no longer assume they know who to look for or even how to look for them, according to the report.

“There seems no longer any clear profile of a terrorist,” states the report. “Moreover, the means through which many of these persons were radicalized -- over the Internet -- suggests that these days you can aspire to become a terrorist in the comfort of your own bedroom.”

The types of attacks these new Islamic radicals are attempting to carry out have also evolved. Previously, al-Qaeda and its allies were focused on large-scale attacks on high-profile targets that resulted in mass casualties. However, due largely to the success of current and past counter-terrorism efforts, the new breed of terrorists radicalized inside the United States seek to carry out smaller, less-deadly attacks that intend to stress the capabilities of authorities and first responders.

“Now it is clear that terrorist groups see operational value in conducting more frequent and less sophisticated attacks that can place severe stress on finite intelligence and law enforcement resources,” state Bergen and Hoffman. [2]

Al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations have realized that such low-scale attacks are valuable because they are harder to disrupt, cost less to organize, and still result in a similar level of confusion and fear as high-profile attacks. In addition to their low-cost nature, al-Qaeda and other groups understand that low-scale terrorists “only have to get lucky once,” meaning that it is highly cost-effective for them to plan multiple low-cost attacks, even if some of them fail, according to the report.

This April 1998 picture shows al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan. (AP Photo)

This is because as U.S. counter-terrorism has evolved, authorities have learned how to prevent and disrupt high-cost, complex terror plots. With low-rent terrorism however, the operational and financial links that are often the undoing of complex plots are minimal, making them substantially more difficult for authorities to detect and disrupt, states the rpeport’s authors.

Additionally, low-rent terrorists can remain under the radar and better avoid detection: a benefit that al-Qaeda and other groups realize outweighs the low-rent operatives’ lack of training.

Hoffman and Bergen advise that instead of adding additional layers to the domestic counter-terrorism bureaucracy, greater coordination is needed. Above all, they say, authorities must encourage a greater maturity among citizens when it comes to terrorist attacks. Denying this new breed of terrorists the publicity and coverage they crave is perhaps the only thing that ultimately will defeat them.

“When the U.S. demonstrates its national resilience in the face of terrorism, terrorist groups will have little to gain by attacking the American homeland,” reads the report. “When federal agencies work well with one another and their counterparts at the state and local levels, and reach out to everyday Americans, the United States will be far better able to detect and prevent future attacks.”

“Only then can America succeed at maintaining the upper hand in the face of an adversary who continues to demonstrate the ability to learn and adapt,” state Hoffman and Bergen.


Home    TOC    Top

 Muslims burn down Christian shops and church

February 27, 2010    WorldNetDaily

Melee reportedly broke out with no provocation from Christians

An angry Muslim mob attacked Christian-owned shops and houses, burned down eight churches and injured several people in the northern Nigerian town of Kazaure. But the melee was prompted by a Muslim police officer who had a dispute with a Muslim citizen, according to a group that monitors persecution of Christians.

The Muslim police officer pulled over a Muslim for a traffic violation Feb. 21, but the driver became angry and refused to stop, explained International Christian Concern's Jonathan Racho. The police officer then pursued the driver, caught up with him and assaulted the driver after forcefully removing him from the car.

The driver was taken to the hospital where he was pronounced dead upon arrival.

Tension in the region has been high since last month's Muslim rioting in Jos where 300 people reportedly were killed, human rights activists report.

"The driver died from his wounds received from the police officer. But it's important to note that this has nothing to do with any of the area's Christian residents," Racho explained. "It was a traffic incident, and neither the police officer nor the driver were Christians."

Racho said the Muslim mob "came together and tried to attack the police station."

"When they couldn't do that, they turned their attention to the Christians in the city. They burned down several Christian shops and a church."

Racho said Muslim mobs frequently have attacked Christians in mostly Muslim northern Nigeria.

"Any provocation from Christians is enough. But this time there was no Christian involvement. This time it's clear that there was absolutely no connection between this incident and the anti-Christian violence," he said.

Racho believes the attacks will continue in northern Nigeria because of the political climate.

"In northern Nigeria, all of the government officials are Muslims. The law is Shariah law and particularly designed to stop the spread of Christianity," he said.

"So there is already a hostile environment for Christians in northern Nigeria. So, any excuse they can find to mobilize will be used to attack and persecute Christians," said Racho

The Nigerian government has not responded to requests for comment on this story.

Last year, for the first time, a U.S. secretary of state designated Nigeria a "country of particular concern," guilty of particularly severe violations of religious freedom under the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998.

"Years of inaction by Nigeria's federal, state and local governments has created a climate of impunity, resulting in thousands of deaths," the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, the USCIRF, said in its current annual report.

The USCIRF, an independent body established by Congress to help fulfill the 1998 legislation, sent a team to Nigeria last year to "assess religious freedom conditions" in the country.

"Concerns include an ongoing series of violent communal and sectarian conflicts along religious lines; the expansion of sharia (Islamic law) into the criminal codes of several northern Nigerian states; and discrimination against minority communities of Christians and Muslims," the commission's report said.

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit

Home    TOC    Top

 New video messages from militant cleric, U.S.-born al Qaeda spokesman

October 23, 2010 By the CNN Wire Staff

Yemeni-American cleric says Islam is in "severe need for guidance"

Anwar Al-Awlaki has been linked to al Qaeda in Yemen, where he is suspected of hiding

(CNN) -- Yemeni-American cleric and militant Anwar al-Awlaki appeared in a new video message Saturday, saying that Islam is in "severe need for guidance in these dark situations" and that the religion is "exposed to fateful dangers."

In the limited portion of the video that was immediately available to CNN, al-Awlaki called on Muslim scholars to help address the situation.

Al-Awlaki has been linked to al Qaeda terrorists in Yemen, where he is believed to be in hiding.

U.S. officials say al-Awlaki helped recruit Umar Farouk AbdulMutallab, the Nigerian man charged with trying to blow up a Northwest Airlines trans-Atlantic flight as it landed in Detroit, Michigan, on Christmas Day.

Al-Awlaki is also said to have exchanged e-mails with accused Fort Hood shooter, Maj. Nidal Hasan.

U.S. officials have confirmed that he is on a CIA and military hit list to be captured or killed.

CNN could not immediately verify the authenticity of the video, including when or where the taping took place. The video message was posted Saturday on the jihadist website Shumoukh al-Islam.

The video's release came on the same day that an American-born al Qaeda spokesman urged Muslims to carry out individual jihad in the United States and Europe in a new video.

"My brothers: Know that jihad is your duty as well, and that you have an opportunity to strike the leaders of unbelief and retaliate against them on their own soul, as long as there is no covenant between you and them," said the spokesman, Adam Gadahn, in a video posted to various jihadist forums, according to the SITE Intelligence Group.

"Here you are in the battlefield, just like the heroes before you like Muhammad Atta and ... Umar Farouk AbdulMutallab, Faisal Shazad and hundreds of others," Gadahn said, referring to the leader of the 9/11 attacks, the man accused of trying to blow up a plane last Christmas, and the would-be Times Square bomber.

A transcript of the tape was supplied by SITE, a terrorist-tracking organization based outside Washington. SITE said the video was produced by al Qaeda's media arm and was in Arabic with English subtitles. The video ran nearly 50 minutes, SITE said.

Both messages come amid increased threats of attacks on Western targets from al Qaeda.

This month, the second edition of an online al Qaeda magazine surfaced, featuring frank essays, creatively designed imagery, and ominous terror tips such as using a pickup as a weapon and shooting up a crowded restaurant in Washington.

The magazine is called Inspire, and intelligence officials suspect that an American citizen named Samir Khan, now living in Yemen, is the driving force behind the publication.

The latest edition emerged on the 10th anniversary of the suicide attack on the guided missile destroyer USS Cole, which was struck as it refueled in Aden, Yemen. Seventeen people were killed in the bombing.

Find this article at:

 Radical Islamist Group Is Returning to Chicago for Major Recruitment Drive - 6/16/2010

By Diane Macedo    Published June 16, 2010

They're back. A radical Islamist group critics say has links to Al Qaeda is gearing up to host its second annual U.S. recruiting event.

The group, Hizb ut-Tahrir America, which is committed to establishing a caliphate, or international Islamic empire, kicked up controversy in Chicago last year with its first U.S. conference, “Fall of Capitalism & Rise of Islam.”

Speakers at the conference blamed capitalism for everything from two World Wars to Michael Jackson's decision "to shed his black skin." It drew more than 500 attendees, dozens of protesters and a heavy police presence.

Now the group is coming back to the Windy City with its second conference, “Emerging World Order: How the Khilafah Will Shape the World," scheduled to begin July 11 at the Chicago Marriott Oak Brook. According to a video promoting the event, the goal is to persuade attendees to “answer the call” to "join the campaign" for a Khilafah, or global Islamic empire.

Despite the charged message, the group insists that it advocates change only through nonviolent means.

Terrorism "is not in our dictionary," spokesman Mohammad Malkawi told reporters last year. "We condemn it by all means … From our perspective, our records are clean on this issue."

But some experts say the group's rhetoric masks its true role: preparing the infantry for groups like Al Qaeda by indoctrinating young jihadists.

“Hizb ut-Tahrir realized that U.S. laws, in this stage, allow them to work undetected as long as they use a narrative that fools the public and law enforcement,” Walid Phares, director of the Future of Terrorism Project at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told

He said the group’s vision of a worldwide caliphate is "is identical to the Taliban regime but spanning on three continents, as a first stage."

Former Hizb ut-Tahrir member Ishtiaq Hussain agreed.

"They don’t believe Israel should exist, some of their leaders have denied the Holocaust, and they believe homosexuals should be thrown off the highest building," Hussain, now a trainer for the Quilliam Foundation, told "... It's actually a very dangerous group."

Phares said Hizb ut-Tahrir's list of alumni -- including confessed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Al Qaeda in Iraq's onetime leader, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi -- speaks for itself.

“The bottom line here," he said, "is that we are witnessing the emergence and the expansion of a jihadist recruitment factory in our midst, openly calling for jihad and for the establishment of a caliphate instead of many governments... and in its last stage to what they call jihadism against America and its allies, that is, technically speaking, terrorism and massacre."

Hizb ut-Tahrir America did not respond to requests for comment sent by e-mail. The group's website lists neither a phone number nor a mailing address.

At a recent conference in the United Kingdom, Hizb ut-Tahrir spoke directly against the U.S., mocking Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's warning of severe consequences if a Pakistani connection to the Times Square bomber was discovered, and contending that the U.S. was behind terror attacks in Pakistan.

Whether there will be similar rhetoric at next month's conference in Chicago is unclear. Unlike last year, the group has no itinerary laid out on its website for this year's conference.

The Chicago Marriott Oak Brook confirmed that it would be hosting the conference, but it would not comment on whether it had reviewed the group or was aware of its specific plans for the conference.

But news of the hotel chain's hospitality came as a surprise to the Florida Security Council, which said the Marriott of Delray Beach, Fla., backed out of hosting one of its events last year when it planned to honor an anti-jihadism advocate.

The group, which aims to raise awareness of security threats facing Florida and the U.S. by "radical, supremist, Muslims," and "Latin American totalitarianism," is now suing the Marriott for breach of contract.

“You let lunatics come into your hotel, and then you have people trying to defend the United States of America and you throw them out … the double standard is glaring and obvious and absurd,” Florida Security Council Director Tom Trento told

Marriott's Corporate Office did not respond to requests for comment on the Hizb ut-Tahrir conference or the Florida case.

But Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, President of American Islamic Forum for Democracy, said he thinks the decision of whether or not to host an event like this should be left to the hotel.

"It [Hizb ut-Tahrir] is a conveyor belt to terror, there’s no doubt about it, but the issue is if we’re going to change these hearts and minds and we’re going to prevent the future Nidal Hassans of the world, we’re not going to do it by making these types of things illegal,” Jasser told

Instead, Jasser said, the U.S. needs to “start to provide Muslim youth an alternative to where America is not demonized but where we change the narrative and start to promote groups that are reformist.”

“I’d like us to debate them publicly in order to prove how invalid their ideas are rather than shut them down and make them into victims,” he said. “…I think it’s the type of thing we need to expose.”

Hizb ut-Tahrir America, meanwhile, is seeking some exposure of its own.

A YouTube video advertising the conference has more 13,000 views, a Facebook page promoting the event has more than 2,400 fans, and countless supporters in the U.S. and abroad have "Tweeted" and "ReTweeted," news of the upcoming conference, extending Hizb ut-Tahrir America's reach far beyond its known followers.

With an 11,000-square-foot ballroom reserved at the Marriott, it apparently expects to acquire many more in Chicago next month.

 AL-TAQIYA ... The Muslim Method Of Conquest

Extract from article By Professor Walid Phares:

In the early years of the Tawheed (Islamic conquest of the Arabian peninsula) and in the Fatah (Arab-Islamic invasion and conquest of the upper Middle East and the outside world), a Muslim concept was devised to achieve success against the enemy, Al-Taqiya..

Al-Taqiya, from the verb Ittaqu, means linguistically dodge the threat. Politically it means simulate whatever status you need in order to win the war against the enemy..

According to Al-Taqiya, Muslims were granted the Shar'iya (legitimacy) to infiltrate the Dar el-Harb (war zone), infiltrate the enemy's cities and forums and plant the seeds of discord and sedition.(*0*) These agents were acting on behalf of the Muslim authority at war, and therefore were not considered as lying or denouncing the tenants of Islam.(*1*) They were "legitimate" mujahedeen, whose mission was to undermine the enemy's resistance and level of mobilization. One of their major objectives was to cause a split among the enemy's camp. In many instances, they convinced their targeted audiences that Jihad is not aimed at them, that indigenous people are not targeted, only Bysantium power. They convinced many Jews that they will be protected from Christians, called pagans,(*2*) and they convinced many Christians that Jews were the mortal enemies, because they killed Issa (Jesus).(*3*) They convinced the Aramaics, Copts, and Hebrews that the enemy is Greece, and signed peace agreements with the Bysantines Greeks at the expense of Maronite Aramaics, etc.(*4*)

This Jihadic agency of subversion was one of the most fascinating and efficient arms of the conquest. In less them four decades the MIddle East fell to the Arab-Islamic rule, followed by north Africa and Central Asia.

Al-Taqiya was a formidable weapon, used by the first dynasties and strategists. Today, scholars may identify it as deception. But the Jihadic deception was and still is more powerful than the James Bondian methods of Western classical intelligence tactics, for the simple reason that it has a civilizational, global dimension versus the narrow state interest of the regular Western subversive methods.

Al-Taqiya is still in use today but not necessarily state-organized. One can easily detect Taqiya in the two discourses used by Islamist strategists. On the one hand, one comprehensive Islamist theory is attempting to mobilize Middle East, and sometimes Western Christian leaders and intellectuals, against "evil Jews."(*5*) We see considerable success on that level. And on the other hand, another Islamist comprehensive theory is attemting -with success also- to mobilize the Jews against "evil and pagan Christians."(*6*) One can easily detect the sophisticated work of Taqiya, for the strategic objective of Islamists is to destroy the foundations of the Judeo-Christian civilization, as a prelude to the defeat of an isolated Israel.

Taqiya is not a unique phenomenon in History, many strategists from all backgrounds implemented subversion. But the uniqueness of today's Taqiya is its success within advanced and sophisticated societies. Taqiya is winning massively because of the immense lack of knowledge among Western elites, both Jewish and Christian.(*7*)

For interesting examples of Taqiya methods, visit Christian discussion groups and forums and note the discourse of Islamist visitors, aimed at undermining the Christian perception of Jews,(*8*) and visit Jewish discussion groups and forums and note the subtle anti-Christian discourse of Islamists visitors.(*9*) It is really informative and fascinating.


Professor Walid Phares teaches in the Department of Religion, Florida International University.

My Notes: (*n*) is a note number refering to a sentence or paragraph immediately prior to the note number. i.e. paragraph (*n*)

0. One of such discords is planting the story that 9/11 was an inside job and it was done by Mossad and CIA on orders from Sharon and Bush. The story is obviously false but there will always be somebody who for selfish reason, for money and fame, like Michel Moore in "Fahrenheit 911" will pick up the idea and build up on the suspicion and create a conspiracy theory. This was picked up by politicians and others who saw the opportunity to advance their own carriers. Soon more conspiracy theorists followed and we have been exposed to "Loose Change" which initially was supposedly a project aimed to prove how easy it is to concoct a plausible conspiracy theory that people will believe simply because they don't likethe Bush administration. This was so successful that authors decided to sell the video and make money. After all Michel Moore got rich so why not them? Before too long brand new cottage industry was created and "experts" emerged who "scientifically" attempted to prove that it was indeed a conspiracy.

Thus taqiya (deception) worked beyond wildest expectations of muslim planters of this particular discord.

1. Prime example are 9/11 hijackers who were frequenting nightclubs and have been seen drinking.

2. The whole idea that antisemitism is primarily character of a christian fundamentalism.

3. Jewish Zionism is to be blamed for all the problems in the world. Jews just want to dominate and rule by controlling the money.

4. That is what the muslims mean when they tell the story how the poor Copts were oppressed by Byzantium and asked Caliph Umar al Khattab for help who obliged them by sending Amr Al-As with an army to "open Egypt" as one of the muslims wrote. The Copts never recovered from that error in judgment. This strategy was repeatedly used to conquer most of middle east and Northern Africa.

5. Again it involves the charge that Zionists and Jews in general are conspiring to enslave the rest of the world and exploit everybody to enrich Jews. They also deny the Holocaust ever happened.

6. Spreading the accusations that Christians in general and Catholic Church and The Pope in particular are antisemitic bigots and conspired with Hitler to exterminate Jews. Then they go on to point out differences and reinforce mistrust and misunderstanding between various christian sects.

7. Muslims are reinforcing this false notion that islam is a "religion of peace" and word "islam" means Peace. Nothing further from the truth, "Islam" means submission to Allah and by that to muslims as a group. They also make sure to explain away any discrepancies in the Koran by saying that everyone is wrongly taking verse out of context. muslims will never admit that you are right, unless you agree with them, of course. They also claim that in order to interpret Koran one must speak and read Arabic fluently as a way to undermine the credibility of any critic. One successful deception was to convince president Bush to follow advice from muslims rather then Christian or Jewish experts on islam.

8. Cast suspicion on Atheists, Zionists and Jews in general. Blame atheists for moral decay and Jews for any financial problems.

9. cast suspicion on motives and attitudes of Christians toward Jews and Atheists.

#################   Deutsche Übersetzung - schade am besten kann meine Software tun.

AL-TAQIYA... Die moslemische Methode der Eroberung

Extrakt vom Artikel Durch den Professor Walid Phares:

In den frühen Jahren des Tawheed (Islamische Eroberung der arabischen Halbinsel) und im Fatah (Arabisch-islamische Invasion und Eroberung des oberen Nahen Ostens und der Außenwelt) wurde eine moslemische Vorstellung ausgedacht, um Erfolg gegen den Feind, Al-Taqiya zu erreichen..

Al-Taqiya, vom Verb Ittaqu, weichen Mittel linguistisch der Drohung aus. Politisch bedeutet es täuschen beliebigen Status vor Sie brauchen, um den Krieg gegen den Feind zu gewinnen..

Gemäß Al-Taqiya wurde Moslems der Shar'iya (Gesetzmäßigkeit) gewährt, um den Dar el-Harb (Kriegszone) eindringen zu lassen, die Städte des Feinds und Foren eindringen zu lassen und die Samen der Dissonanz und Aufwiegelung zu pflanzen. (*0 *) handelten Diese Agenten im Auftrag der moslemischen Gewalt am Krieg, und wurden deshalb als das Lügen oder das Kündigen der Mieter des Islams nicht betrachtet. (*1 *) waren Sie "legitimer" mujahedeen, dessen Mission war, den Widerstand des Feinds und Niveau der Mobilmachung zu untergraben. Eines ihrer Hauptziele sollte einen Spalt unter dem Lager des Feinds verursachen. In vielen Beispielen überzeugten sie ihre ins Visier genommenen Zuschauer, dass Jihad auf sie nicht gerichtet wird, dass Stammbevölkerung, nur Bysantium Macht nicht ins Visier genommen wird. Sie überzeugten viele Juden, dass sie vor Christen, genannt Heiden geschützt werden, (*2 *) und sie viele Christen überzeugten, dass Juden die Erzfeinde waren, weil sie Issa (Jesus) töteten. (*3 *) überzeugten Sie den Aramaics, Kopten, und Hebräer, dass der Feind Griechenland ist, und schloß Friedensverträge mit den Bysantines Griechen auf Kosten von Maronite Aramaics, usw. (*4 *)

Diese Jihadic Agentur des Umsturzes war einer der faszinierendsten und effizienten Arme der Eroberung. In weniger ihnen vier Jahrzehnte fiel der NAHE OSTEN zur Arabisch-islamischen Regel, gefolgt durch das nördliche Afrika und Zentralasien.
Al-Taqiya war eine furchterregende Waffe, verwendet von den ersten Dynastien und Strategen. Heute können Gelehrte es als Betrug identifizieren. Aber der Jihadic Betrug war und ist noch stärker als die Methoden von James Bondian der klassischen Westnachrichtendiensttaktik aus dem einfachen Grund, dass es einen civilizational, globale Dimension gegen das schmale Zustandinteresse der regelmäßigen umstürzlerischen Westmethoden hat.

Al-Taqiya ist noch im Gebrauch heute aber nicht notwendigerweise zustandorganisiert. Man kann Taqiya in den zwei von Islamist Strategen verwendeten Gesprächen leicht entdecken. Einerseits versucht eine umfassende Islamist Theorie, den Nahen Osten, und manchmal Christliche Westführer und Intellektuelle gegen "schlechte Juden zu mobilisieren." (*5 *) Wir sehen beträchtlichen Erfolg auf diesem Niveau. Und andererseits ist eine andere Islamist umfassende Theorie attemting - mit dem Erfolg auch-, um die Juden gegen das "Übel und Heiden Christen zu mobilisieren." (*6 *) kann Man die hoch entwickelte Arbeit von Taqiya leicht entdecken, weil das strategische Ziel von Islamists ist, die Fundamente der Zivilisation von Judeo-Christen als eine Einleitung zum Misserfolg eines isolierten Israels zu zerstören.

Taqiya ist nicht ein einzigartiges Phänomen in der Geschichte, viele Strategen von allen Hintergründen führten Umsturz durch. Aber die Einzigartigkeit von heutigem Taqiya ist sein Erfolg innerhalb von fortgeschrittenen und hoch entwickelten Gesellschaften. Taqiya gewinnt massiv wegen der riesigen Unwissenheit unter Westeliten, sowohl jüdisch als auch Christlich. (*7 *)

Für interessante Beispiele von Taqiya Methoden, besuchen Sie Christliche Diskussionsgruppen und Foren und bemerken Sie das Gespräch von Islamist Besuchern, zielte darauf, die Christliche Wahrnehmung von Juden, (*8 *) zu untergraben und jüdische Diskussionsgruppen und Foren besuchen und das feine Gespräch von anti-Christen von Islamists Besuchern bemerken. (*9 *) Das ist wirklich informativ und faszinierend.


Professor Walid Phares unterrichtet in der Abteilung der Religion, Florida Internationale Universität.

Meine Zeichen: (*n *) ist eine Zeichen-Zahl, die sich auf einen Satz oder Paragraphen sofort vor der Zeichen-Zahl bezieht. d. h. Paragraph (*n *) 0. Eine solcher Dissonanzen pflanzt die Geschichte, dass 9/11 ein Innenjob war und es durch Mossad und CIA auf Befehl von Sharon und Bush getan wurde. Die Geschichte ist offensichtlich falsch aber es wird immer jemanden geben, wer aus dem egoistischen Grund, aus dem Geld und Berühmtheit, wie Michel Moore in "Fahrenheit 911" die Idee aufnehmen und sich auf dem Verdacht entwickeln und eine Komplott-Theorie schaffen wird. Das wurde von Politikern und anderen aufgenommen, die die Gelegenheit sahen, ihre eigenen Träger vorzubringen. Bald folgten mehr Komplott-Theoretiker, und wir sind "zum Kleingeld" ausgestellt worden, das am Anfang vermutlich ein Projekt war, das gerichtet ist, um sich zu erweisen, wie leicht es eine plausible Komplott-Theorie zusammenbrauen soll, die Leute einfach glauben werden, weil sie nicht likethe Verwaltung von Bush tun. Das war so erfolgreich, dass sich Autoren dafür entschieden, das Video zu verkaufen und Geld zu machen. Nachdem der ganze Michel Moore reich also warum nicht sie wurde? Vor der zu langen Marke wurde neue Heimindustrie geschaffen, und "Experten" erschienen, wer "wissenschaftlich" versuchte zu beweisen, dass das tatsächlich ein Komplott war.

So arbeitete taqiya (Betrug) außer wildesten Erwartungen moslemischer Pflanzer dieser besonderen Dissonanz.

1. Hauptbeispiel ist 9/11 Luftpiraten, die Nachtklubs oft besuchten und gesehen worden sind trinkend.

2. Die ganze Idee, dass Antisemitismus in erster Linie Charakter eines christlichen Fundamentalismus ist.

3. Jüdischer Zionismus soll für alle Probleme in der Welt verantwortlich gemacht werden. Juden wollen gerade vorherrschen und herrschen, indem sie das Geld kontrollieren.

4. Das ist das, was die Moslems meinen, wenn sie die Geschichte erzählen, wie die armen Kopten durch Byzanz und gebetenen Kalifen Umar Al Khattab für die Hilfe bedrückt wurden, der sie nötigte, indem er Amr Leider mit einer Armee sandte, Ägypten" "zu öffnen, wie einer der Moslems schrieb. Die Kopten erholten sich nie von diesem Fehler im Urteil. Diese Strategie wurde wiederholt verwendet, um den grössten Teil des Nördlichen und Ostenafrikas zu überwinden.

5. Wieder schließt es die Anklage ein, dass sich Zionisten und Juden im Allgemeinen verabreden, die Ruhe der Welt zu versklaven und jeden auszunutzen, um Juden zu bereichern. Sie bestreiten auch, dass der Holocaust jemals geschah.

6. Das Verbreiten der Beschuldigungen, dass Christen in der allgemeinen und Katholischen Kirche und Dem Papst insbesondere antisemitische engstirnige Fanatiker und heimlich geplant mit Hitler sind, um Juden auszurotten. Dann setzen sie fort, auf Unterschiede hinzuweisen und Misstrauen zu verstärken und zwischen verschiedenen christlichen Sekten missverstehend.

7. Moslems verstärken diesen falschen Begriff, dass Islam eine "Religion des Friedens" ist und Wort "Islam" Frieden bedeutet. Nichts weiter von der Wahrheit bedeutet "Islam" Vorlage Allah und dadurch Moslems als eine Gruppe. Sie überzeugen sich auch, um sich aus irgendwelchen Diskrepanzen im Koran dadurch herauszureden, zu sagen, dass jeder Vers aus dem Zusammenhang falsch nimmt.   Moslems werden nie zugeben, dass Sie recht haben, wenn Sie mit ihnen natürlich übereinstimmen. Sie behaupten auch, dass, um Koran zu interpretieren, man sprechen und Arabisch fließend als eine Weise lesen muss, die Vertrauenswürdigkeit jedes Kritikers zu untergraben. Ein erfolgreicher Betrug sollte Präsidenten Bush überzeugen, um Rat von Moslems eher dann Christliche oder jüdische Experten auf dem Islam zu folgen.

8. Wurf-Verdacht auf Atheisten, Zionisten und Juden im Allgemeinen. Machen Sie Atheisten für den moralischen Zerfall und Juden für irgendwelche Finanzprobleme verantwortlich.

9. Wurf-Verdacht auf Motiven und Meinungen von Christen zu Juden und Atheisten.

Home    Back    Top

 Sound familiar?? Seems like a carbon copy of what is happening in the USA:

Denmark - a must read!

This article could be seen as racist by some but on the other hand it could also be seen as a reflection of our own reality that somehow our politicians refuse to see. The interpretation is up to the reader, however it is food for thought...

SALUTE to Denmark... They are trying to fix a huge problem.

This could very well happen here on our Continent...

Susan MacAllen, a Canadian citizen, is a contributing editor for ([ ]

Salute Denmark – Today’s Symbol of Western Freedom.

By Susan MacAllen In 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark. But in 1978 - even in Copenhagen, one didn't see Muslim immigrants.

The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 - a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at the time.

The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism.

Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies - it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism.

How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets - all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back to bite?   By the 1990's the growing urban Muslim population was obvious - and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious.  Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim-exclusive enclaves. 

As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark's liberal way of life, the Danes - once so welcoming - began to feel slighted.   Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long-standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history.

An article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecasted, accurately, that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported: 'Muslim immigrants constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending.' 'Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes.'   'Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population.  A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane.'

'Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem.'   'Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark's Muslim population grows large enough - a not-that-remote prospect.

If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim.' It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws.   An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and Canada: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives.   Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden - before the Nazis could invade.  I think of my Danish friend Elsa - who, as a teenager, had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers - and I wonder what she would say today.  

In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years - one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration.   Today, Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe. (Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of 'racism' by liberal media across Europe - even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration.)  

If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark's history, culture, and a Danish language test.  You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship.   You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won't find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to Denmark with you.

You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren't.   In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government's welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary.  

In other words, the welfare system, as it existed, was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. 'We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration.'

'The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now,' he said. A large thorn in the side of Denmark's imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, 'The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference,' Hvilshoj says, 'There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come.' And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, 'In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, and freedom of speech.' Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family's thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark.

The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time - in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce. Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened. Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law. And meanwhile, Canadians clamor for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in Canada look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history. We would do well to look to Denmark, and say a prayer for her future and for our own. If you agree this article has value, then please pass it on.

Islam is no different from CANCER, they are working their way into every culture like a disease & if we don't do something NOW (as described above) then all other cultures will be in serious trouble.

WW3 will be Islam against what remains of the free western world.

Home    Back    Top

 Tönen vertraut? Ist einem Durchschlag dessen ähnlich, was in Deutchland geschieht:

Dänemark - ein in gelesenes Müssen!

Dieser Artikel konnte als Rassist durch einige gesehen werden, aber andererseits konnte es auch werden Sie als ein Nachdenken unserer eigenen Wirklichkeit das irgendwie unsere Politiker gesehen Abfall, um zu sehen. Die Interpretation ist bis zum Leser, jedoch ist es Essen dafür Gedanke...

Gruß Dänemark - Heutiges Symbol der Westfreiheit.

Das konnte sehr gut hier auf unserem Kontinent geschehen...

Susan MacAllen, ein kanadischer Bürger, ist ein beitragender Redakteur dafür ([http: //]

Grüßen Sie die dänische Fahne - es ist ein Symbol der Westfreiheit

Susan MacAllen

In 1978-9 lebte ich und studierte in Dänemark. Aber 1978 - sogar darin Kopenhagen sah man moslemische Einwanderer nicht.

Die dänische Bevölkerung umarmte Besucher, feierte das exotische, ging daraus seine Weise, jeden seiner Bürger zu schützen. Das war auf seine neue Marke dessen stolz sozialistischer Liberalismus ein in der Entwicklung seit den Konservativen hatte Macht verloren 1929 - ein System, wo sich kein Arbeiter anstrengen musste, wo ein zu überleben schließlich konnte auf den Zustand als in, vielleicht, keine andere Westnation zählen zurzeit.

Die Ruhe Europas sah die Skandinavier als Freidenkerei, progressiv und ungeheuer großzügig in ihren Sozialfürsorge-Policen. Dänemark rühmte sich niedrigen Verbrechens Raten, Hingabe zur Umgebung, einem höheren Bildungssystem und einer Geschichte der Menschenfreundlichkeit.

Dänemark war auch in seinen Einwanderungspolicen am großzügigsten - es bot sich begrüßen Sie am besten in Europa dem neuen Einwanderer: großzügige Sozialfürsorge-Zahlungen davon die erste Ankunft plus zusätzliche Nebeneinkünfte im Transport, Unterkunft und Ausbildung. Es war entschlossen, ein Weltbeispiel für die Einschließlichheit anzuführen, und multiculturalism. Wie es konnte, dass eines Tages 2005 eine Reihe dessen vorausgesagt haben politische Cartoons in einer Zeitung würden Gewalt befeuern, die Dutzende verlassen würde tot in den Straßen - allen, weil sein Engagement zu multiculturalism würde kommen Sie zurück, um zu beißen?

Vor den 1990er Jahren war die wachsende städtische moslemische Bevölkerung - und sein offensichtlich Abgeneigtheit, in die dänische Gesellschaft zu integrieren, war offensichtlich. Jahre dessen Einwanderer hatten sich in moslemisch-exklusive Enklaven niedergelassen. Als der Moslem Führung wurde mehr stimmlich darüber, wessen sie über die Dekadenz nachdachten Dänemarks liberale Lebensweise, die Dänen - einmal zu begrüßend - begannen sich zu fühlen slighted. Viele Dänen hatten begonnen, Islam als unvereinbar mit ihrem zu sehen seit langer Zeit bestehende Werte: Glaube an die persönliche Freiheit und Redefreiheit, an die Gleichheit für Frauen, in der Toleranz für andere ethnische Gruppen, und einen tiefen Stolz auf Dänisch Erbe und Geschichte.

Ein Artikel durch Daniel Pipes und Lars Hedegaard, in dem sie voraussagten, genau, dass das wachsende einwandernde Problem in Dänemark explodieren würde. Darin der Artikel berichteten sie:

'Moslemische Einwanderer setzen 5 Prozent der Bevölkerung ein aber verzehren sich aufwärts 40 Prozent der Sozialfürsorge-Ausgaben. '

'Moslems sind nur 4 Prozent von Dänemarks 5.4 Millionen Menschen aber setzen a zusammen Mehrheit der verurteilten Vergewaltiger des Landes, eines besonders brennbaren Problemes in Anbetracht dessen, dass praktisch alle weiblichen Opfer nichtmoslemisch sind. Ähnlich, wenn kleiner werden Missverhältnisse in anderen Verbrechen gefunden. '

'Im Laufe der Zeit, wie moslemische Einwanderer in Zahlen zunehmen, mögen sie weniger sich vermischen mit der einheimischen Bevölkerung. Ein neuer Überblick findet das nur 5 Prozent dessen junge moslemische Einwanderer würden einen Dänen sogleich heiraten. '

'Erzwungene Ehen - das Versprechen einer neugeborenen Tochter in Dänemark einem männlichen Vetter zuhause Land, dann sie dazu zwingend, ihn, manchmal auf dem Schmerz dessen zu heiraten Tod - ist ein Problem. '

'Moslemische Führer erklären offen ihre Absicht, Islamisches Gesetz einmal einzuführen Dänemarks moslemische Bevölkerung wächst groß genug - nicht dass entfernte Aussicht. Wenn gegenwärtige Tendenzen, verharren Soziologe-Schätzungen, jeder dritte Einwohner Dänemarks in 40 Jahren wird moslemisch sein. '

Es ist leicht zu verstehen, warum eine wachsende Zahl von Dänen diesen Moslem fühlen würde Einwanderer zeigen wenig Rücksicht für dänische Werte und Gesetze.

Ein Beispiel ist das Phänomen allgemein für andere europäische Länder und Kanada: einige Moslems in Dänemark, die wählten, um den moslemischen Glauben zu verlassen, sind ermordet worden im Namen des Islams, während sich andere in der Angst für ihre Leben verbergen. Juden sind auch bedroht und schikaniert offen von moslemischen Führern in Dänemark, ein Land wo sobald Christliche Bürger arbeiteten, um fast alle ihre 7,000 Juden dadurch zu schmuggeln die Nacht nach Schweden - vor den Nazis konnte einfallen. Ich denke an meinen dänischen Freund Elsa - wer, als ein Teenager, gefürchtet hatte, die Straße zur Bäckerei jeder zu durchqueren Morgen unter den Augen, Nazistische Soldaten - zu besetzen, und frage ich mich was sie würde heute sagen.

2001 wählte Dänemark zum grössten Teil der konservativen Regierung in ungefähr 70 Jahren- derjenige, der einige entschieden nichtgroßzügige Ideen über den unbehinderten Liberalen hatte Einwanderung. Heute hat Dänemark die strengsten Einwanderungspolicen in Europa. (Seine Anstrengung, sich zu schützen, ist mit Beschuldigungen wegen 'des Rassismus' dadurch getroffen worden liberale Medien über Europa - gerade als andere Regierungen zum Recht kämpfen soziale durch Jahre der auch-lockeren Einwanderung hervorgebrachte Probleme.)

Wenn Sie dänisch werden mögen, müssen Sie drei Jahren von Sprachklassen beiwohnen. Sie müssen einen Test auf Dänemarks Geschichte, Kultur, und einem dänischen Sprachtest bestehen.

Sie müssen in Dänemark seit 7 Jahren vor dem Bewerben um Staatsbürgerschaft leben.

Sie müssen eine Absicht demonstrieren, zu arbeiten, und ein Job-Warten zu haben. Wenn Sie dazu wünschen bringen Sie einem Gatten in Dänemark, Sie müssen mehr als 24 Jahre alt, und Sie sowohl sein wird es so leicht mehr nicht finden, Ihre Freunde und Familie nach Dänemark damit zu bewegen Sie.

Ihnen wird nicht erlaubt, eine Moschee in Kopenhagen zu bauen. Obwohl Ihr Kinder haben eine Wahl von ungefähr 30 arabischer Kultur und Sprachschulen darin Dänemark, sie werden stark ermutigt, um sich zur dänischen Gesellschaft darin zu assimilieren Arten, wie vorige Einwanderer nicht waren.

Ein großer Dorn in der Seite von Dänemarks Imams ist der Minister der Einwanderung und Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. Sie fackelt mit der neuen Politik dazu nicht lange Einwanderung, 'Die Zahl von Ausländern, die zum Land kommen, macht a Unterschied,' Hvilshoj sagt, 'Es eine umgekehrte Korrelation zwischen wie viel gibt kommen Sie hier, und wie gut wir die Ausländer erhalten können, die kommen. 'Und auf dem Moslem Einwanderer, die müssen, eine Bereitwilligkeit zu demonstrieren, sich 'in meiner Ansicht harmonisch zu verbinden, Dänemark sollte ein Land mit dem Zimmer für verschiedene Kulturen und Religionen sein. Einige Werte sind jedoch wichtiger als andere. Wir lehnen zur Frage ab Demokratie, Gleichberechtigung, und Redefreiheit. '

Hvilshoj hat einen Preis für ihre Show des Rückgrats bezahlt. Vielleicht, sie zu prüfen Entschlossenheit, der radikale Hauptimam in Dänemark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, gefordert dass das Regierungsbezahlungsblutgeld zur Familie eines Moslems, der war ermordet in einer Vorstadt Kopenhagens, dass der Durst der Familie danach feststellend Rache konnte für das Geld durchgekreuzt werden. Als Hvilshoj seine Nachfrage, ihn entließ diskutiert, dass in der moslemischen Kultur die Zahlung des Vergeltungsgeldes, dafür allgemein war der Hvilshoj antwortete, dass, was in einem moslemischen Land getan wird, nicht ist notwendigerweise, was in Dänemark getan wird.

Die moslemische Antwort kam bald danach: ihr Haus war torched während sie, ihr Mann und Kinder schliefen. Alle schafften, unversehrt, aber sie und ihre Familie zu flüchten wurden zu einer heimlichen Position bewegt, und sie und andere Minister wurden zugeteilt Leibwächter zum ersten Mal - in einem Land, wo solche mörderische Gewalt war einmal so knapp.

Ihre Regierung ist nach rechts geglitten, und ihre Grenzen haben sich gestrafft. Viele glauben Sie, dass, was im nächsten Jahrzehnt geschieht, ob Dänemark bestimmen wird überlebt als eine Bastion des guten Lebens, des humanen Denkens und sozial Verantwortung, oder ob es eine Nation am Bürgerkrieg mit Unterstützern dessen wird Sharia-Gesetz.

Und inzwischen schreien Kanadier nach strengeren Einwanderungspolicen, und Nachfrage ein Ende, um Sozialfürsorge-Programme festzusetzen, die vielen Einwanderern erlauben, von zu leben öffentliches Almosen. Wie wir in Kanada auf die Enklaven von Moslems unter uns schauen, und sieh, dass diejenigen, die in unsere Küsten zu leicht eingehen, sich lebend auf unseren Steuern trauen, noch ablehnen um unsere Kultur zu umarmen, respektieren Sie unsere Traditionen, nehmen Sie an unserem gesetzlichen teil System, folgen Sie unseren Gesetzen, sprechen Sie unsere Sprache, schätzen Sie unsere Geschichte. Wir würden tun gut, auf Dänemark zu achten, und ein Gebet für ihre Zukunft und für unser eigenes zu sagen.

Wenn Sie zugeben, dass dieser Artikel Wert dann hat geben Sie es bitte weiter.

Islam ist nicht von KREBS verschieden, sie arbeiten ihr Weg in jeden die Kultur wie eine Krankheit, und wenn wir etwas JETZT (wie beschrieben, oben) dann nicht tun alle anderen Kulturen werden in ernsten Schwierigkeiten sein.

WW3 wird Islam dagegen sein, was von der freien Westwelt bleibt.

Home    Back    Top